Comparison of clinically significant infection rates among prehospital-versus in-hospital-initiated i.v. lines.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of infection for i.v. lines placed in the prehospital versus in the in-hospital setting in a midsized emergency medical service system.

DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was made of all i.v. line site infections among patients admitted to ward beds from a university hospital emergency department in 1992.

METHODS: The hospital's infection control team conducted daily ward rounds and a surveillance of all wound and blood cultures. Patients with signs and/or symptoms consistent with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for skin and soft tissue infection were reported to the responsible medical team. Infections were documented based on consensus opinion between the infection control team and the physicians responsible for the care of the patient. IV lines placed in the prehospital phase of care were identified by electronic retrieval from the prehospital database.

RESULTS: Three thousand one hundred eighty-five patients who had a prehospital or an in-hospital i.v. line placed were admitted from the ED. Eight hundred fifty-nine i.v. lines were prehospital placed (27%), and 2,326 were in-hospital placed (73%). There was one infection in the prehospital group and four in the in-hospital group (infection rate: .0012 for prehospital patients and .0017 for in-hospital patients; P = .591 by Fisher's exact test).

CONCLUSION: Both cohorts had exceptionally low infection rates. No clinically or statistically significant increase in the risk of infection among prehospital- or in-hospital-initiated i.v. lines was identified.