Chest Compression-Only CPR by Lay Rescuers and Survival From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

TitleChest Compression-Only CPR by Lay Rescuers and Survival From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2010
AuthorsBobrow B.J, Spaite D.W, Berg R.A, Stolz U., Sanders A.B, Kern K.B, Vadeboncoeur T.F, Clark L.L, Gallagher J.V, Stapczynski J.S, LoVecchio F., Mullins T.J, Humble W.O, Ewy G.A
JournalJama-Journal of the American Medical AssociationJama-Journal of the American Medical Association
Volume304
Pagination1447-1454
Date PublishedOct 6
ISBN Number0098-7484
Accession NumberISI:000282509900020
Keywordsamerican-heart-association, basic life-support, bystander cardiopulmonary-resuscitation, committee, health-care professionals, statement, stroke-foundation, task-force, to-mouth ventilation, ventricular-fibrillation
Abstract

<p>Context Chest compression-only bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be as effective as conventional CPR with rescue breathing for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Objective To investigate the survival of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using compression-only CPR (COCPR) compared with conventional CPR.Design, Setting, and Patients A 5-year prospective observational cohort study of survival in patients at least 18 years old with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2009, in Arizona. The relationship between layperson bystander CPR and survival to hospital discharge was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression.Main Outcome Measure Survival to hospital discharge.Results Among 5272 adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac etiology not observed by responding emergency medical personnel, 779 were excluded because bystander CPR was provided by a health care professional or the arrest occurred in a medical facility. A total of 4415 met all inclusion criteria for analysis, including 2900 who received no bystander CPR, 666 who received conventional CPR, and 849 who received COCPR. Rates of survival to hospital discharge were 5.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4%-6.0%) for the no bystander CPR group, 7.8% (95% CI, 5.8%-9.8%) for conventional CPR, and 13.3% (95% CI, 11.0%-15.6%) for COCPR. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for survival for conventional CPR vs no CPR was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.69-1.43), for COCPR vs no CPR, 1.59 (95% CI, 1.18-2.13), and for COCPR vs conventional CPR, 1.60 (95% CI, 1.08-2.35). From 2005 to 2009, lay rescuer CPR increased from 28.2% (95% CI, 24.6%-31.8%) to 39.9% (95% CI, 36.8%-42.9%; P&lt;.001); the proportion of CPR that was COCPR increased from 19.6% (95% CI, 13.6%-25.7%) to 75.9% (95% CI, 71.7%-80.1%; P&lt;.001). Overall survival increased from 3.7% (95% CI, 2.2%-5.2%) to 9.8% (95% CI, 8.0%-11.6%; P&lt;.001).Conclusion Among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, layperson compression-only CPR was associated with increased survival compared with conventional CPR and no bystander CPR in this setting with public endorsement of chest compression-only CPR. JAMA. 2010; 304(13): 1447-1454</p>

Short TitleJAMA-J. Am. Med. Assoc.
Alternate JournalJama-J Am Med AssocJama-J Am Med Assoc
Faculty Reference: 
Daniel W. Spaite, MD
Arthur B. Sanders, MD, MHA, FACEP, FACP
Weight: 
0