Are plain radiographs sufficient to exclude cervical spine injuries in low-risk adults?

<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b>The routine use of clinical decision rules and three-view plain radiography to clear the cervical spine in blunt trauma patients has been recently called into question.</p><p><b>CLINICAL QUESTION: </b>In low-risk adult blunt trauma patients, can plain radiographs adequately exclude cervical spine injury when clinical prediction rules cannot?</p><p><b>EVIDENCE REVIEW: </b>Four observational studies investigating the performance of plain radiographs in detecting cervical spine injury in low-risk adult blunt trauma patients were reviewed.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION: </b>The consistently poor performance of plain radiographs to rule out cervical spine injury in adult blunt trauma victims is concerning. Large, rigorously performed prospective trials focusing on low- or low/moderate-risk patients will be needed to truly define the utility of plain radiographs of the cervical spine in blunt trauma.</p>